Palindromes With Todd Solondz’s Palindromes presently rereleased by Monument Releasing in a brand new 4K restoration on the event of its twentieth anniversary, we’re reposting Matthew Ross’s interview with Solondz from our Spring, 2005 print version. The movie opens at this time at New York’s Metrograph Theater earlier than touring to Philadelphia, Atlanta and Los Angeles within the weeks forward.
It was 9 years in the past that Todd Solondz took dwelling the Grand Jury Prize at Sundance for his second function, Welcome to the Dollhouse. One of the seminal indies of the late Nineteen Nineties, the movie earned greater than $4 million on the field workplace and made the press-shy writer-director an icon of the indie motion. Solondz, for his half, by no means embraced the highlight, resisting media-friendly characterizations of his work and the “geek chic” label that got here with it. (Several years later he would refuse even to be photographed.)
In the years since, lots of Solondz’s worthy contemporaries — filmmakers like Todd Haynes, Richard Linklater, David O. Russell and Darren Aronofsky — have managed to efficiently toe the road between inventive expression and business success, taking up larger, arguably extra accessible initiatives and discovering champions for his or her work inside the studios or their specialty divisions. Not so with Solondz, who with every subsequent movie continues to problem viewers expectations together with his forays into the dysfunction, perversion and self-deception of the American center class.
Financially talking, Solondz’s profession post-Dollhouse hasn’t been straightforward. His 1998 ensemble comedy Happiness, winner of the FIPRESCI prize at Cannes, was dropped by its distributor, Universal, though it nonetheless managed to earn almost $3 million on the field workplace after its manufacturing firm, Good Machine, distributed it by itself. Then, in 2002, Solondz returned with Storytelling, an oddly structured but deeply compelling work a few politically right school coed’s relationship along with her unscrupulous African-American school professor, coupled with a second story about an exploitative documentary filmmaker and his disastrous makes an attempt to make a movie a few typical suburban household.
After he discovered no backers for his subsequent movie, Palindromes, Solondz determined to finance the Super 16mm manufacturing himself. Not surprisingly, it’s his most aesthetically and politically provocative work to this point. The movie tells the story of Aviva — performed within the movie by eight totally different actors, together with Jennifer Jason Leigh — a 13-year-old Jewish woman from Long Island whose solely want is to have a child. After her liberal dad and mom (Ellen Barkin and Richard Masur) power her to terminate a being pregnant, Aviva goes on the street, the place she instantly finds herself concerned with a pedophile truck driver (performed magnificently by Stephen Adly-Guirgis). She ultimately finally ends up on the home of Mama Sunshine (Debra Monk), a Christian fundamentalist who splits her time between adopting disabled youngsters and plotting to destroy abortion clinics. What emerges is a deeply philosophical fable of a Twenty first-century, Red State–Blue State America. The movie, which premiered final 12 months on the Telluride Film Festival and has since screened at Venice, Toronto and New York, shall be launched by Wellspring in April.
Filmmaker: How did the concept for this movie come about?
Solondz: It’s humorous — I all the time have these concepts for motion pictures that’ll be very marketable and worthwhile and business and so forth, and I all the time really feel decided to try to make certainly one of these motion pictures. And what occurs as a substitute is I discover myself writing one thing that I don’t wish to write as a result of I do know it’s not going to be any of these issues. In a way, you don’t select the story; the story chooses you. Certainly there are issues which can be on the market on the earth that feed into all of this. I keep in mind studying about some abortionist killer who was captured in Georgia and the way his neighborhood was very quietly sympathetic to his predicament. There’s the concept of how it doesn’t matter what you do, what aspect of the coin you might be on — politically, ideologically — that it’s a part of human nature to all the time assume that one is doing good, that one is on the suitable aspect of issues. Even Stalin on his deathbed thought he was individual.
Filmmaker: The film offers in a sophisticated manner with abortion politics. How do you talk about your personal views on the topic with reference to the best way it’s handled within the movie?
Solondz: We’re all burdened by our biases and prejudices and so forth, which is why I strive with the steadiness between Aviva’s and Mama Sunshine’s households to err in favor of the Christian conservative household, as a result of that’s not the place I’m from. I would like the viewers to have the ability to look at, reassess and reevaluate a few of the preconceptions they could have. If I say I’m pro-choice, then the viewers can calm down; they’ll say, “It’s okay, he’s pro-choice.” But by not saying that, I hope to make the viewers watch this a bit extra cautiously, make it not fairly really easy for them. I’m not there to say, “Yes, you’re right, I’m with you.” That is of no curiosity for me. I wish to power you to look at and assess the ethical penalties and dimensions of what it means to tackle these positions. And in addition to that, in fact, if I say I’m pro-choice, nobody who’s pro-life will come see the film.
I imply, what do you do when your 13-year-old daughter comes dwelling pregnant and desires to maintain the infant? It’s a disaster, a nightmare. How does one deal with such a scenario? And that is a part of what fuels this story, of what for me is the saddest of all my comedies — which I describe as unhappy comedies. It’s actually for me essentially the most heartbreaking as a result of it’s primarily a narrative of a younger woman simply on a quest for love. What does it imply if you happen to’re a 13-year-old and also you wish to have a child? It’s not the infant itself that you really want, however fairly what the infant symbolizes, which is a type of unconditional love that you just really feel you’re not getting from your loved ones or buddies or whatnot.
Filmmaker: The concept of free will versus predestination is without doubt one of the philosophical points that you just contact on on this film. There’s that scene on the finish through which Mark Wiener provides fairly an articulate but in addition deeply pessimistic, even cynical evaluation of that concept. Not solely are we trapped by our personal genetics bodily and biologically, he says, but in addition maybe by way of our character and mind, by way of our capability to vary.
Solondz: I don’t actually see him as a cynic, however I actually can see he’s a bit bit grimmer and bleaker than I’m in sure methods. But I agree with most of what he says: that the concept of free will is one thing of an phantasm or an arrogance. But this incapability to vary in some sense will be liberating. It will be liberating to just accept one’s failings, flaws and limits. That generally is a good factor. Of course, Mark is struggling the trauma of getting been falsely accused of being a pedophile, so I’m sympathetic to him there. I feel that if you happen to’ve been very profitable in life, individuals are inclined to imagine that it was via arduous work and since you made the suitable choices, whereas those that haven’t been fairly so profitable are inclined to see issues as only a collection of dangerous luck. We wish to imagine that we’ve a alternative, however in reality we don’t. It’s all a results of the entire experiences and DNA which have mixed with randomness to create an inevitable outcome. The concept of the clear slate, that one can wipe out one’s previous and begin another time, is a harmful phantasm. But while you go to the films, you might be usually requested to determine with a lovely protagonist who says and does the suitable factor, and maybe even behaves heroically on the finish, in order that by having made this identification with this protagonist you’ll have this excellent type of narcissistic excessive. When you watch certainly one of my motion pictures, there is no such thing as a narcissism, since you are requested to attach with people who find themselves very flawed and fail in some ways. The level of [doing this] isn’t to inform you that you’re dangerous or that individuals are dangerous, however to try to get to a sure reality about who we’re.
And so my motion pictures operate in a really totally different manner. I imply, narcissism and selfdeception are usually not dangerous issues — they’re one thing that all of us want. Without them we’d soar out the window. My motion pictures are type of a response to my understanding of this dynamic and the way this performs itself out.
Filmmaker: One of the criticisms which were leveled at you up to now is that you just’re merciless in direction of your characters. Does that criticism trouble you?
Solondz: Of course there’s a satirical thrust to what I do. I don’t see that as a nasty factor. There’s typically a type of exploration of cruelty, however I don’t see myself as merciless. But there’s no level in quarreling about this. I like these characters, I like spending time with them, and if I didn’t I wouldn’t put myself via this. At the Sunshine home for instance, it’s all very frivolous and enjoyable, after which in fact there’s a satirical ingredient to it. But you additionally love these disabled youngsters. Some individuals will take umbrage with [the scene] and say, “How can you laugh if there are children with disabilities?” But it’s not at their expense. If it had been at their expense, it could be an obscenity. My argument is that it’s a type of condescension to not have the ability to chortle simply because the youngsters have disabilities. To me they’re simply youngsters, interval. I didn’t divide them into these with disabilities and people with out. To me, in reality, essentially the most shifting second of the entire movie production-wise was after they had been performing these musical numbers, numbers that they took such satisfaction and pleasure in performing. And in fact on the similar time you step again and also you say, “Oh my God, what are they singing?” But that’s a part of the dynamic, the friction that’s emblematic of what I do. Do I chortle, do I not chortle? If I chortle, what am I laughing at? But the joke is actually not on the expense of youngsters with disabilities. There’s no logic that’s accessible to me that might account for that kind of response.
Filmmaker: Why do you assume the response to your work has been so vicious at occasions?
Solondz: Well, I can’t account for individuals’s capability or incapability to answer what I do. All I can say is my motion pictures require a sure type of open-mindedness, and typically a liberal thoughts shouldn’t be all the time an open one.
Filmmaker: Formally you are taking some new dangers on this film. Whereas Storytelling was structurally fairly experimental, this movie finds its experimentation in having a number of totally different actors play Aviva.
Solondz: I stands out as the first to place it entrance and middle, however Buñuel did this in his final film, That Obscure Object of Desire. My feeling has all the time been that an viewers can settle for all types of guidelines so long as you follow them. They could be a bit confused at first. “Wait, she’s a black child, she’s Latina, she’s a redhead — what’s going on?” But they get the cling of it. Also, it’s all the time been a fantasy of mine that when you’ve gotten three actors up for an element and so they all have fantastic qualities, you want you can mix all of them into one. Well, I received to try this right here. And you may carry all types of nuance and shade to this character by having all these totally different individuals play the half. The hope was that the cumulative impact emotionally can be extra highly effective than had it been only one individual. She begins as a small little black woman, then later when she’s an enormous black girl — the concept was of Gulliver surrounded by Lilliputians there, kind of keying into the storybook fairy-tale side of the film — after which while you see Jennifer Jason Leigh’s face on the finish, you see a face that’s lived a life, like within the fairy tales the place the character goes away and comes again on the finish of the day as an previous man. And but she’s nonetheless only a 13-year-old woman. I used to be making an attempt to extract this high quality of innocence, of fragility, vulnerability, from my characters, in order that’s what I targeted on for every of the actors taking part in the components. That’s the glue or cohesion for all of them.
Filmmaker: What was the making of this movie like compared to your different movies?
Solondz: Well, I put a few of my very own cash into this [laughs], a variety of my very own cash, nearly all of it, simply to get the factor rolling. Everyone mentioned, “Oh, you’ll have no trouble,” however no person wished to finance it. It’s not very encouraging for unbiased filmmakers, however that’s what occurs I suppose while you’re coping with quite a lot of elements that make it tough to boost cash. Thank God that we bought the film and I’ll be okay. I’ll break even.
Filmmaker: You mentioned there have been some elements. What had been they?
Solondz: The market is so unclear to me. In Europe, for instance, there’s one thing in regards to the TV market bottoming out — I don’t even know what meaning. And they’re not occupied with “American independent filmmakers” the best way they as soon as had been. And the local weather being what it’s, this materials was deemed a bit too problematic for distributors to wish to actually cope with, as a result of everybody might inform from the start that this was not going to be an R-rated film. Once you’ve gotten youngsters in a film with delicate subject material, it’s just a bit scary for anybody who’s related with any kind of company.
Filmmaker: Outside of the financing, did you go about making this movie in a distinct type of manner?
Solondz: No. The plus about doing it this manner is you actually don’t want approval from anybody — you simply do what you need. If you need a star, you’ll get a star. If you don’t need a star, you don’t get a star. You are solely restricted by the truth that you don’t have cash, ? We had a variety of favors, a variety of kindness, that eliminated a variety of the stress.
Filmmaker: I’ve heard that you just by no means do rehearsals and that on the set you do little or no directing of the actors.
Solondz: It’s extra like upkeep, so to talk. Sometimes I simply should remind them of some issues. With each actor it’s totally different. Everyone has totally different wants. Some want extra hand-holding or extra consideration and others wish to be left alone. I’ll do no matter is critical to get what I would like, but it surely’s true, you don’t have the time. I imply, when are you able to make time for rehearsal? The rehearsal is the audition — that’s the place I get it carried out. And then after they’re on a set, I simply pray that they know their traces.
Filmmaker: The movie has performed at quite a lot of high festivals already. What has the response been like to this point?
Solondz: It’s unpredictable. I’ve had individuals who say it’s the most effective film I’ve made and others say it’s the worst film I’ve made. I can’t actually connect an excessive amount of that means to that. But I can say I take as a lot satisfaction on this as I’ve taken satisfaction in the rest I’ve carried out as a filmmaker.
Leave a Reply